peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Details
- Path
- skills/peer-review
- License
- MIT license
- Allowed tools
- 1
- Bundled scripts
- 2
- Dependencies
- 3
Allowed tools
Read Write Edit Bash
Bundled scripts
- skills/peer-review/scripts/generate_schematic_ai.py
- skills/peer-review/scripts/generate_schematic.py