Skip to content

WebJev

Open Apache-2.0 browser-agent decision model (Qwen3.5-35B-A3B fine-tune) that doubled Jev 1.13's task success in the same agent.

ServiceresearchApache-2.0

Overview

WebJev is a Jev-like decision model specialized for browser use. Given a live web page, it picks the next operation and target element in a single forward pass, answering the per-step Choice questions of Browser Use's jev-ultrafast agent behind the same /v1/systemone API. It is a fine-tune of Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, with Apache-2.0 weights, training data and recipe, and a demo app.

On 125 hand-picked real-website tasks graded by deterministic verifiers, with only the decision model swapped, WebJev completed 38.5 percent versus 16.7 percent for Jev 1.13. On eight public single-step decision benchmarks the two were close (83.7 versus 84.7 percent). A showcase of six tasks where WebJev succeeded and Jev failed was re-run three times per model: WebJev succeeded in 16 of 18 takes and Jev in 0 of 18, with failure modes such as giving up at cookie dialogs.

What the decision model decides

TypeQuestionAnswers
ChoiceWhich operation should the browser agent perform next?—
ChoiceWhich page element should the operation target?—

How it works

  1. The jev-ultrafast agent observes the live page.
  2. WebJev picks the next operation and target element.
  3. The agent executes it in the browser.
  4. A deterministic verifier grades task completion.

Strengths

  • Much higher end-to-end success than Jev 1.13 in the same agent.
  • Open weights, data and recipe.
  • Drop-in via the /v1/systemone API.

Caveats

  • Large model (35B total, 3B active) needs serious hardware.
  • Tasks were hand-picked; showcase is selected successes.

At a glance

Type
Service
Status
research
Language
Python
Runtime
GPU model server (/v1/systemone)
Has code
yes
License
Apache-2.0

Use cases and integrations

How curated lists describe it

  • Browser agents: open-weight Apache-2.0 decision model (a Qwen3.5-35B-A3B fine-tune) that answers jev-ultrafast's per-step `Choice` questions for the next operation and its target element behind the same `/v1/systemone` API, completing 38.5% of 125 hand-picked real-website tasks graded by deterministic verifiers versus 16.7% for Jev 1.13 in the same agent.

    yibie/awesome-jev
  • Jev-compatible decision model for browser agents: a Qwen3.5-35B-A3B fine-tune that picks the next operation and target element in the Jev Ultrafast loop, behind a `/v1/systemone`-compatible server. On 125 real-website tasks graded by deterministic verifiers, it completes 38.5% vs 16.7% for Jev 1.13 in the same agent. Apache-2.0 weights, training data and recipe, and a demo app.

    AnotiaWang/awesome-decision-models

Frequently asked questions

How much better is it than Jev for browsing?

38.5 versus 16.7 percent task success on 125 real-website tasks in the same agent.

Is it better at single-step decisions?

No, the two are close (83.7 vs 84.7 percent).

Which agent does it plug into?

Browser Use's jev-ultrafast.

Related projects

  • Local browser agent that picks each step's operation and element with a Jev-shaped model such as a fine-tuned Laya, no cloud needed.

    MCP serverbetaPython
  • Browser-agent benchmark with five timed events from one prompt, plus a ~200-line DevTools agent where Jev picks each action.

    ProjectbetaJavaScript
  • Computer-use platform (Cua Spaces, Driver, Lume) with CUA-S1 small decision models and a preview jev-use example for bounded actions.

    ProjectbetaPython
  • ego-decision-layer: measured, pluggable decision layer for ego lite where Jev picks operation and target in one request.

    ProjectbetaTypeScript
  • Plugs any CDP browser, including engines that never draw a page, into a Jev loop that picks operations and targets from the DOM.

    LibrarybetaPython
  • Browser automation where Jev picks every step from a sightmap's named actions and reports whether the goal is met.

    ProjectbetaGo