Skip to content

local-jev-bench

Benchmark of nine local Jev-style decision engines on Apple Silicon across English and Korean sets, with paired significance tests.

Benchmarkresearch

Overview

local-jev-bench runs Jev-style System One decision models locally on an Apple Silicon Mac (an M3 Max with 36 GB) and benchmarks them on the same questions. Engines include Kev, Winnow, Clef, Clef-flash, Von, Jeff, AnyJev, Laya (including a typed-decisions fine-tune), CLM and Decider. Test sets cover English and Korean customer tickets, a 20-way BANKING77 intent subset, Kev's out-of-distribution transfer-v4 set, a typed-decisions leaderboard set, and Korean NSMC movie reviews and KLUE-YNAT headlines.

It reports accuracy, calibration (ECE and KL against gold distributions), option-order stability and latency, and uses paired McNemar tests to say which differences are real. Headline findings: Kev-9B, Kev-4B, Winnow, Decider-4B, Clef and Clef-flash form the top group and are separated only on some sets; Kev's advantage on transfer-v4 comes only from held-out sources resembling its own training data; Laya's typed-decisions fine-tune wins only on its own set; training-free AnyJev matches the top group on some sets but is poorly calibrated on typed-decisions; and Clef-flash leads on BANKING77-20 with the lowest ECE on four of seven sets but is slow on llama.cpp. Documentation is in English and Korean.

What the decision model decides

TypeQuestionAnswers
ChoiceWhich intent, category or label fits this item? (benchmark tasks)—
OtherAre two engines' accuracy differences statistically significant? (McNemar tests)—

How it works

  1. Install local engines on Apple Silicon
  2. Run each engine on the same English and Korean sets
  3. Measure accuracy, ECE, KL, option-order stability and latency
  4. Compare engines with paired McNemar tests
  5. Report which differences hold

Strengths

  • Many local engines on identical items
  • Statistical tests rather than raw rankings
  • Korean-language coverage
  • Calibration and order-stability measures

Caveats

  • Single machine; some latencies from a busier setup
  • Some engines' training data is unpublished
  • Results may change as models update

At a glance

Type
Benchmark
Status
research
Language
Python
Runtime
benchmark scripts on Apple Silicon
Has code
yes

Use cases and integrations

How curated lists describe it

Frequently asked questions

Which local engine is best?

Kev, Winnow, Decider, Clef and Clef-flash form a top group that is often statistically tied.

Does it test non-English data?

Yes, Korean tickets, movie reviews and news headlines.

Does it compare with hosted Jev?

The focus is local engines; it notes Cloudflare's own latency figures for Clef.

Related projects

  • JevBench★ 268

    MIT-licensed benchmark and leaderboard for Jev-class decision models: accuracy, calibration, latency and cost on sealed tiers.

    BenchmarkproductionPython
  • Probability-aware evaluation of decision models: calibration, coverage at a fixed error budget and latency, Jev vs GLiNER2.5.

    BenchmarkresearchPython
  • Reproducible benchmark comparing Jev with hosted and open decision models on rule application, probabilities, latency and cost.

    BenchmarkresearchPython
  • Metamorphic benchmark testing whether decision-model probabilities stay coherent under 50 laws, with no gold labels.

    BenchmarkresearchPython
  • First Chinese calibration benchmark for Jev-class models: accuracy, ECE, option order and script robustness.

    BenchmarkresearchPython
  • Pre-registered field test of Jev, GLiNER2.5-Decide, Laya and other decision models against small LLMs on fresh September 2026 data.

    ProjectresearchPython