Pareto 26.10 vs GLM 5
Both have similar output pricing, while Pareto 26.10 offers a larger context window. Choose Pareto 26.10 or GLM 5 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Pareto 26.10 | GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | — | Z.ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.80 | $1.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $3.20 | $3.20 |
| Context window | 1M | 205K |
| Parameters | — | 744B |
| Open weights | — | Yes |
| Released | — | Feb 2026 |
| LiveBench score | — | 68.7 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual score | — | 69.7 |
| FrontierMath score | — | 16.4 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 146 |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 87.8 |
| SWE-bench Verified score | — | 72.8 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1446 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1435 |
FAQ
Is Pareto 26.10 or GLM 5 cheaper?
Pareto 26.10 and GLM 5 have comparable output pricing.
Which has the larger context window, Pareto 26.10 or GLM 5?
Pareto 26.10 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.