tasksource Decider nano v4 (150M) vs ScaleDown Classify-1
tasksource Decider nano v4 (150M) and ScaleDown Classify-1 have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | tasksource Decider nano v4 (150M) | ScaleDown Classify-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | tasksource | ScaleDown |
| Decision Index score | 17.6 | — |
| Calibration error (ECE) | 0.069 | — |
| Median latency (p50) | 14 ms | — |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | — | $0.0080 |
| Parameters | 149M | — |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| Question types | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | Cross-encoder (NLI) | Encoder classifier |
| License | apache-2.0 | proprietary |
FAQ
Is tasksource Decider nano v4 (150M) or ScaleDown Classify-1 more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, tasksource Decider nano v4 (150M) or ScaleDown Classify-1?
No calibration difference between tasksource Decider nano v4 (150M) and ScaleDown Classify-1 is recorded yet.
Is tasksource Decider nano v4 (150M) or ScaleDown Classify-1 cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.