Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 4.7
Both have similar output pricing, while Qwen3.8 27B offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen3.8 27B or GLM 4.7 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen3.8 27B | GLM 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.24 | $0.60 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.20 | $2.20 |
| Context window | 1M | 205K |
| Parameters | — | 358B |
| Open weights | — | Yes |
| Released | — | Dec 2025 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1441 | 1435 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1594 | 1435 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1271 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 152 | 144 |
| LiveBench score | — | 57.3 |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 83.3 |
| FrontierMath score | — | 2.4 |
FAQ
Is Qwen3.8 27B or GLM 4.7 cheaper?
Qwen3.8 27B and GLM 4.7 have comparable output pricing.
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3.8 27B or GLM 4.7?
Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.