Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 | inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | SiliconFlow |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.09 | $0.14 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.55 | $0.57 |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | No |
| Released | — | Sep 2025 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1419 | 1361 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 139 | — |
FAQ
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 cheaper?
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.55 vs $0.57 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.