Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs GLM 4.6V
GLM 4.6V is cheaper on output tokens, while GLM 4.6V offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or GLM 4.6V based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | GLM 4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | — | Z.ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.66 | $0.30 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.00 | $0.90 |
| Context window | 33K | 131K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | — |
| Released | — | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | 16.4 | — |
| SWE-bench Verified score | 47.0 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1230 | 1376 |
| LiveBench score | — | 38.9 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1164 |
FAQ
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or GLM 4.6V cheaper?
GLM 4.6V is cheaper on output tokens ($0.90 vs $1.00 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or GLM 4.6V?
GLM 4.6V has the larger context window (131K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.