DeepSeek/DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus-Thinking vs GLM 4.5V
DeepSeek/DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus-Thinking is cheaper on output tokens, while DeepSeek/DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus-Thinking offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek/DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus-Thinking or GLM 4.5V based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek/DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus-Thinking | GLM 4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qiniu | Z.ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.58 | $0.60 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.74 | $1.80 |
| Context window | 128K | 66K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | — |
| Released | Sep 2025 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1333 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1154 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek/DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus-Thinking or GLM 4.5V cheaper?
DeepSeek/DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus-Thinking is cheaper on output tokens ($1.74 vs $1.80 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek/DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus-Thinking or GLM 4.5V?
DeepSeek/DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus-Thinking has the larger context window (128K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.