opendecider-nano vs Cloudflare clef
opendecider-nano and Cloudflare clef have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | opendecider-nano | Cloudflare clef |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | manjunathshiva | Cloudflare |
| Decision Index score | — | 53.1 |
| Calibration error (ECE) | — | 0.040 |
| Median latency (p50) | — | 102 ms |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | — | — |
| Parameters | 395M | 28B |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Question types | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | Span encoder (GLiNER family) | Decoder LM with a decision readout |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
FAQ
Is opendecider-nano or Cloudflare clef more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, opendecider-nano or Cloudflare clef?
No calibration difference between opendecider-nano and Cloudflare clef is recorded yet.
Is opendecider-nano or Cloudflare clef cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.