GPT-4o-mini vs inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens, while inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 offers a larger context window. Choose GPT-4o-mini or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | GPT-4o-mini | inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | SiliconFlow |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.14 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.57 |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Sep 2025 |
| Aider Polyglot score | 3.6 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1286 | 1361 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1066 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 37.7 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 127 | — |
FAQ
Is GPT-4o-mini or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 cheaper?
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.57 vs $0.60 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, GPT-4o-mini or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 has the larger context window (131K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.