GPT-4o-mini vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
GPT-4o-mini is cheaper on output tokens, while GPT-4o-mini offers a larger context window. Choose GPT-4o-mini or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | GPT-4o-mini | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.66 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 128K | 33K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | — |
| Released | Jul 2024 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | 3.6 | 16.4 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 37.7 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1286 | 1230 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1066 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 127 | — |
| SWE-bench Verified score | — | 47.0 |
FAQ
Is GPT-4o-mini or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper?
GPT-4o-mini is cheaper on output tokens ($0.60 vs $1.00 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, GPT-4o-mini or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
GPT-4o-mini has the larger context window (128K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.