GPT OSS 120B vs inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens, while GPT OSS 120B offers a larger context window. Choose GPT OSS 120B or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | GPT OSS 120B | inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Neon | SiliconFlow |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.14 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.57 |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Parameters | 117B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| LiveBench score | 46.4 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | 41.8 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1361 |
FAQ
Is GPT OSS 120B or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 cheaper?
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.57 vs $0.60 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, GPT OSS 120B or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
GPT OSS 120B has the larger context window (131K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.