Xing 4.0 29B A4B vs GLM 4.6V
Both have similar output pricing, while Xing 4.0 29B A4B offers a larger context window. Choose Xing 4.0 29B A4B or GLM 4.6V based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Xing 4.0 29B A4B | GLM 4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NanoGPT | Z.ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.22 | $0.30 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.90 | $0.90 |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Oct 2026 | — |
| LiveBench score | — | 38.9 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1376 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1164 |
FAQ
Is Xing 4.0 29B A4B or GLM 4.6V cheaper?
Xing 4.0 29B A4B and GLM 4.6V have comparable output pricing.
Which has the larger context window, Xing 4.0 29B A4B or GLM 4.6V?
Xing 4.0 29B A4B has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.