Qwen2.5 72B vs GLM 4.7 Flash
GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on output tokens, while GLM 4.7 Flash offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen2.5 72B or GLM 4.7 Flash based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen2.5 72B | GLM 4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NanoGPT | Z.ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.36 | $0.06 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.41 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 131K | 200K |
| Parameters | 73B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Jul 2025 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 129 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1351 |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 60.5 |
FAQ
Is Qwen2.5 72B or GLM 4.7 Flash cheaper?
GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on output tokens ($0.40 vs $0.41 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen2.5 72B or GLM 4.7 Flash?
GLM 4.7 Flash has the larger context window (200K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.