MiniMax M3 Thinking vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
MiniMax M3 Thinking is cheaper on output tokens, while MiniMax M3 Thinking offers a larger context window. Choose MiniMax M3 Thinking or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | MiniMax M3 Thinking | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NanoGPT | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.23 | $0.66 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.96 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 512K | 33K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Jun 2026 | — |
| LiveBench score | 70.0 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 16.4 |
| SWE-bench Verified score | — | 47.0 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1230 |
FAQ
Is MiniMax M3 Thinking or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper?
MiniMax M3 Thinking is cheaper on output tokens ($0.96 vs $1.00 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M3 Thinking or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
MiniMax M3 Thinking has the larger context window (512K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.