Is Ling 3.1 Flash or Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r cheaper?

Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens ($0.22 vs $2.50 per 1M).

Which has the larger context window, Ling 3.1 Flash or Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r?

Ling 3.1 Flash has the larger context window (262K tokens).

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r

Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens, while Ling 3.1 Flash offers a larger context window. Choose Ling 3.1 Flash or Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.

Spec	Ling 3.1 Flash	Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r
Provider	NanoGPT	NanoGPT
Input / 1M tokens	$0.08	$2.50
Output / 1M tokens	$0.22	$2.50
Context window	262K	128K
Parameters	—	—
Open weights	No	Yes
Released	Sep 2026	Apr 2025

Ling 3.1 Flash details →Llama-xLAM-2 70B fc-r details →

FAQ

Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.