GLM-4 Plus vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens, while GLM-4 Plus offers a larger context window. Choose GLM-4 Plus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | GLM-4 Plus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NanoGPT | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | $7.50 | $0.66 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $7.50 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 128K | 33K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | — |
| Released | Aug 2024 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1331 | 1230 |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 16.4 |
| SWE-bench Verified score | — | 47.0 |
FAQ
Is GLM-4 Plus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens ($1.00 vs $7.50 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, GLM-4 Plus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
GLM-4 Plus has the larger context window (128K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.