MiniMax M2 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
MiniMax M2 is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking offers a larger context window. Choose MiniMax M2 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | MiniMax M2 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.26 | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.02 | $1.20 |
| Context window | 205K | 262K |
| Parameters | 229B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Oct 2025 | — |
| SWE-bench Verified score | 61.0 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1340 | 1368 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1297 | — |
| LiveBench score | — | 51.0 |
FAQ
Is MiniMax M2 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking cheaper?
MiniMax M2 is cheaper on output tokens ($1.02 vs $1.20 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M2 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.