Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 32B
Qwen3 32B is cheaper on output tokens, while Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window. Choose Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 32B based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.19 | $0.08 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.65 | $0.28 |
| Context window | 524K | 131K |
| Parameters | 400B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | 15.6 | 40.0 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 132 | 138 |
| LiveBench score | — | 42.7 |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 65.7 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1340 |
FAQ
Is Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 32B cheaper?
Qwen3 32B is cheaper on output tokens ($0.28 vs $0.65 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 32B?
Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (524K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.