Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs GPT-4.1 Nano
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct is cheaper on output tokens, while GPT-4.1 Nano offers a larger context window. Choose Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct or GPT-4.1 Nano based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct | GPT-4.1 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.35 | $0.10 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.35 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | No |
| Released | — | Apr 2025 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 966 | 1063 |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 8.9 |
| FrontierMath score | — | 1.0 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 130 |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 48.9 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1285 |
FAQ
Is Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct or GPT-4.1 Nano cheaper?
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct is cheaper on output tokens ($0.35 vs $0.40 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct or GPT-4.1 Nano?
GPT-4.1 Nano has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.