Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.3
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens, while Muse Spark 1.3 offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.3 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | Meta |
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.40 | $1.25 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $4.20 | $4.25 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Mar 2025 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1152 | 1309 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1490 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1659 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 157 |
FAQ
Is Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper?
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens ($4.20 vs $4.25 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.3?
Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.