Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens, while Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) offers a larger context window. Choose Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) | Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | LLM Gateway |
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.25 | $1.40 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $4.25 | $4.20 |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Mar 2025 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1152 |
FAQ
Is Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct cheaper?
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens ($4.20 vs $4.25 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?
Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.