Qwen3 14B (greenference) vs MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 14B (greenference) is cheaper on output tokens, while MiMo-V2.5 offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen3 14B (greenference) or MiMo-V2.5 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen3 14B (greenference) | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | Xiaomi |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.08 | $0.12 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.23 | $0.24 |
| Context window | 16K | 1.1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1428 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1247 |
FAQ
Is Qwen3 14B (greenference) or MiMo-V2.5 cheaper?
Qwen3 14B (greenference) is cheaper on output tokens ($0.23 vs $0.24 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3 14B (greenference) or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.