DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) vs Qwen-Plus
Qwen-Plus is cheaper on output tokens, while DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) or Qwen-Plus based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) | Qwen-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.20 | $0.26 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.80 | $0.78 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Oct 2026 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1326 |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 48.1 |
| FrontierMath score | — | 1.7 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) or Qwen-Plus cheaper?
Qwen-Plus is cheaper on output tokens ($0.78 vs $0.80 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) or Qwen-Plus?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.