MiniMax M3 (Consensus Protocol) vs Qwen3.6 Flash
MiniMax M3 (Consensus Protocol) is cheaper on output tokens, while MiniMax M3 (Consensus Protocol) offers a larger context window. Choose MiniMax M3 (Consensus Protocol) or Qwen3.6 Flash based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | MiniMax M3 (Consensus Protocol) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.28 | $0.19 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.10 | $1.13 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Jun 2026 | — |
| LiveBench score | — | 60.5 |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 83.3 |
| FrontierMath score | — | 10.3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 143 |
FAQ
Is MiniMax M3 (Consensus Protocol) or Qwen3.6 Flash cheaper?
MiniMax M3 (Consensus Protocol) is cheaper on output tokens ($1.10 vs $1.13 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M3 (Consensus Protocol) or Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiniMax M3 (Consensus Protocol) has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.