DeepSeek V4 Flash (Cloudflare) vs Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on output tokens, while DeepSeek V4 Flash (Cloudflare) offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash (Cloudflare) or Qwen3.8 27B based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Cloudflare) | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.44 | $0.04 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.32 | $1.25 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Apr 2026 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1438 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1590 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1269 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 152 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash (Cloudflare) or Qwen3.8 27B cheaper?
Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on output tokens ($1.25 vs $1.32 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash (Cloudflare) or Qwen3.8 27B?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Cloudflare) has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.