DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper on output tokens, while DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) or Qwen3.6 Flash based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.28 | $0.19 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.13 | $1.13 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Oct 2026 | — |
| LiveBench score | — | 60.5 |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 83.3 |
| FrontierMath score | — | 10.3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 143 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) or Qwen3.6 Flash cheaper?
Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper on output tokens ($1.13 vs $1.13 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) or Qwen3.6 Flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.