Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens, while Claude 3 Opus offers a larger context window. Choose Claude 3 Opus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $0.66 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $75.00 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 200K | 33K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | — |
| Released | Mar 2024 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 47.2 | — |
| SWE-bench Verified score | 15.8 | 47.0 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1262 | 1230 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1023 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 127 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 16.4 |
FAQ
Is Claude 3 Opus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens ($1.00 vs $75.00 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Claude 3 Opus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Claude 3 Opus has the larger context window (200K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.