Meta Llama Prompt Guard 2 86M vs Gemma 4 31B IT
Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper on output tokens, while Gemma 4 31B IT offers a larger context window. Choose Meta Llama Prompt Guard 2 86M or Gemma 4 31B IT based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Meta Llama Prompt Guard 2 86M | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Helicone | QVAC |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.01 | $0.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.01 | $0.00 |
| Context window | 512 | 262K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Released | Oct 2024 | Apr 2026 |
| LiveBench score | — | 62.4 |
| GPQA Diamond score | — | 75.8 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | — | 143 |
FAQ
Is Meta Llama Prompt Guard 2 86M or Gemma 4 31B IT cheaper?
Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper on output tokens ($0.00 vs $0.01 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Meta Llama Prompt Guard 2 86M or Gemma 4 31B IT?
Gemma 4 31B IT has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.