Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) is cheaper on output tokens, while DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) offers a larger context window. Choose Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Vertex | LLM Gateway |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.35 | $0.28 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.15 | $1.13 |
| Context window | 524K | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1142 | — |
FAQ
Is Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) cheaper?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) is cheaper on output tokens ($1.13 vs $1.15 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu)?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Baidu) has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.