Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens, while Gemma 4 26B A4B IT offers a larger context window. Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Vertex | SiliconFlow |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $0.14 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.57 |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Sep 2025 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 73.2 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1361 |
FAQ
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 cheaper?
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.57 vs $0.60 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.