Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GLM-5.3 Flash (Consensus Protocol)
GLM-5.3 Flash (Consensus Protocol) is cheaper on output tokens, while GLM-5.3 Flash (Consensus Protocol) offers a larger context window. Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B or GLM-5.3 Flash (Consensus Protocol) based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Gemma 4 26B A4B | GLM-5.3 Flash (Consensus Protocol) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LLM Gateway | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.09 | $0.10 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 142 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1434 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1260 | — |
FAQ
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B or GLM-5.3 Flash (Consensus Protocol) cheaper?
GLM-5.3 Flash (Consensus Protocol) is cheaper on output tokens ($0.25 vs $0.30 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GLM-5.3 Flash (Consensus Protocol)?
GLM-5.3 Flash (Consensus Protocol) has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.