Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi-K2
Kimi-K2 is cheaper on output tokens, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite offers a larger context window. Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi-K2 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Kimi-K2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | iFlow | |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.50 | $0.00 |
| Context window | 1M | 128K |
| Parameters | — | 1T |
| Open weights | — | No |
| Released | — | Dec 2024 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 83.3 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 145 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1435 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1268 | — |
FAQ
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi-K2 cheaper?
Kimi-K2 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.00 vs $2.50 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi-K2?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.