GLM-4 (0116) vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Both have similar output pricing, while Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct offers a larger context window. Choose GLM-4 (0116) or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | GLM-4 (0116) | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output / 1M tokens | — | $1.00 |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | — |
| Released | Jan 2024 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1226 | 1230 |
| SWE-bench Verified score | — | 47.0 |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 16.4 |
FAQ
Is GLM-4 (0116) or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper?
GLM-4 (0116) and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct have comparable output pricing.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-4 (0116) or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has the larger context window (33K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.