Skip to content

GLiNER2.5-Decide vs SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (Featherless)

GLiNER2.5-Decide and SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (Featherless) have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.

SpecGLiNER2.5-DecideSimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (Featherless)
ProviderFastinoFeatherless AI
Decision Index score10.1—
Calibration error (ECE)0.088—
Median latency (p50)23 ms—
Cost per 1,000 decisions—Free
Parameters486M—
Open weightsYesYes
Question typesChoice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no, Extraction (typed spans)Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no
MechanismSpan encoder (GLiNER family)Decoder LM with a decision readout
Licenseapache-2.0Apache-2.0 (code)

FAQ

Is GLiNER2.5-Decide or SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (Featherless) more accurate?

At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.

Which is better calibrated, GLiNER2.5-Decide or SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (Featherless)?

No calibration difference between GLiNER2.5-Decide and SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (Featherless) is recorded yet.

Is GLiNER2.5-Decide or SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (Featherless) cheaper per 1,000 decisions?

A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.

Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.