DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot is cheaper on output tokens, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot or MiMo-V2.6-Pro based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Fireworks AI | Xiaomi |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.21 | $0.44 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.84 | $0.87 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Oct 2026 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1491 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1625 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1263 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot or MiMo-V2.6-Pro cheaper?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot is cheaper on output tokens ($0.84 vs $0.87 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.