DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on output tokens, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.01 | $0.44 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.89 | $0.87 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | — |
| Released | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 89.8 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1463 | 1490 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1619 | 1625 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1277 | 1264 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 156 | — |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro cheaper?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on output tokens ($0.87 vs $0.89 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.