DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper on output tokens, while DeepSeek V3.1 offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.1 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.25 | $0.66 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.95 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 164K | 33K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | — |
| Released | — | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1420 | 1230 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 140 | — |
| SWE-bench Verified score | — | 47.0 |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 16.4 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper?
DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.95 vs $1.00 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
DeepSeek V3.1 has the larger context window (164K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.