Cloudflare clef-flash vs Lumma-fev-0.1b
Cloudflare clef-flash and Lumma-fev-0.1b have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | Cloudflare clef-flash | Lumma-fev-0.1b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cloudflare | FrontiersMind |
| Decision Index score | 47.6 | — |
| Calibration error (ECE) | 0.025 | — |
| Median latency (p50) | 53 ms | — |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | — | — |
| Parameters | 10B | 154M |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Question types | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | Decoder LM with a decision readout | Encoder classifier |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
FAQ
Is Cloudflare clef-flash or Lumma-fev-0.1b more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, Cloudflare clef-flash or Lumma-fev-0.1b?
No calibration difference between Cloudflare clef-flash and Lumma-fev-0.1b is recorded yet.
Is Cloudflare clef-flash or Lumma-fev-0.1b cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.