Baseten: Mammoth 1 (free) vs Ryotide Qwen v0.3.1
Baseten: Mammoth 1 (free) and Ryotide Qwen v0.3.1 have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | Baseten: Mammoth 1 (free) | Ryotide Qwen v0.3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baseten | csabag |
| Decision Index score | — | 32.0 |
| Calibration error (ECE) | — | 0.092 |
| Median latency (p50) | — | 81 ms |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | Free | — |
| Parameters | — | 4B |
| Open weights | — | Yes |
| Question types | — | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | — | Decoder LM with a decision readout |
| License | — | — |
FAQ
Is Baseten: Mammoth 1 (free) or Ryotide Qwen v0.3.1 more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, Baseten: Mammoth 1 (free) or Ryotide Qwen v0.3.1?
No calibration difference between Baseten: Mammoth 1 (free) and Ryotide Qwen v0.3.1 is recorded yet.
Is Baseten: Mammoth 1 (free) or Ryotide Qwen v0.3.1 cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.