Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen3.5 27B Claude 4.6 Opus Reasoning Distilled Derestricted Lite
Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen3.5 27B Claude 4.6 Opus Reasoning Distilled Derestricted Lite offers a larger context window. Choose Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen3.5 27B Claude 4.6 Opus Reasoning Distilled Derestricted Lite based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Mistral Small 3.1 | Qwen3.5 27B Claude 4.6 Opus Reasoning Distilled Derestricted Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Azure | NanoGPT |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.31 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.31 |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Released | Mar 2025 | May 2026 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 128 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 41.9 | — |
Mistral Small 3.1 details →Qwen3.5 27B Claude 4.6 Opus Reasoning Distilled Derestricted Lite details →
FAQ
Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen3.5 27B Claude 4.6 Opus Reasoning Distilled Derestricted Lite cheaper?
Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.30 vs $0.31 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen3.5 27B Claude 4.6 Opus Reasoning Distilled Derestricted Lite?
Qwen3.5 27B Claude 4.6 Opus Reasoning Distilled Derestricted Lite has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.