Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct vs MiniMax 2.5
MiniMax 2.5 is cheaper on output tokens, while MiniMax 2.5 offers a larger context window. Choose Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct or MiniMax 2.5 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct | MiniMax 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Azure | Regolo AI |
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.68 | $0.80 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $3.54 | $3.50 |
| Context window | 8K | 190K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Mar 2026 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 40.6 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual score | — | 68.3 |
FAQ
Is Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct or MiniMax 2.5 cheaper?
MiniMax 2.5 is cheaper on output tokens ($3.50 vs $3.54 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct or MiniMax 2.5?
MiniMax 2.5 has the larger context window (190K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.