APUS-Reflex-9B vs arbit-base
APUS-Reflex-9B and arbit-base have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | APUS-Reflex-9B | arbit-base |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | apus-ailab | juteq |
| Decision Index score | — | — |
| Calibration error (ECE) | — | — |
| Median latency (p50) | — | — |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | — | — |
| Parameters | 9B | 421M |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Question types | — | — |
| Mechanism | — | — |
| License | — | — |
FAQ
Is APUS-Reflex-9B or arbit-base more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, APUS-Reflex-9B or arbit-base?
No calibration difference between APUS-Reflex-9B and arbit-base is recorded yet.
Is APUS-Reflex-9B or arbit-base cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.