amos-1-medium vs Standard One 3B SH (v2)
amos-1-medium and Standard One 3B SH (v2) have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | amos-1-medium | Standard One 3B SH (v2) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Scira (mukaddamzaid) | Standard Thinking |
| Decision Index score | — | 39.9 |
| Calibration error (ECE) | — | 0.101 |
| Median latency (p50) | — | 76 ms |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | — | — |
| Parameters | — | 4B |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Question types | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | Decoder LM with a decision readout | Decoder LM with a decision readout |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
FAQ
Is amos-1-medium or Standard One 3B SH (v2) more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, amos-1-medium or Standard One 3B SH (v2)?
No calibration difference between amos-1-medium and Standard One 3B SH (v2) is recorded yet.
Is amos-1-medium or Standard One 3B SH (v2) cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.