Qwen3.5 Flash vs Laguna M.1
Laguna M.1 is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen3.5 Flash offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen3.5 Flash or Laguna M.1 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen3.5 Flash | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | Poolside |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.10 | $0.20 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.40 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | — |
| Released | Feb 2026 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1397 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1243 | 1349 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 82.3 | — |
| FrontierMath score | 6.2 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 144 | — |
FAQ
Is Qwen3.5 Flash or Laguna M.1 cheaper?
Laguna M.1 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.40 vs $0.40 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3.5 Flash or Laguna M.1?
Qwen3.5 Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.