QwQ 32B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
QwQ 32B is cheaper on output tokens, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro offers a larger context window. Choose QwQ 32B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | QwQ 32B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | Xiaomi |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.44 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.86 | $0.87 |
| Context window | 131K | 1.1M |
| Parameters | 33B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Dec 2024 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | 20.9 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1329 | 1490 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 65.3 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 138 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1625 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1264 |
FAQ
Is QwQ 32B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro cheaper?
QwQ 32B is cheaper on output tokens ($0.86 vs $0.87 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, QwQ 32B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.