QwQ 32B vs Xing 4.0 29B A4B
QwQ 32B is cheaper on output tokens, while Xing 4.0 29B A4B offers a larger context window. Choose QwQ 32B or Xing 4.0 29B A4B based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | QwQ 32B | Xing 4.0 29B A4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | NanoGPT |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.22 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.86 | $0.90 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Parameters | 33B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Dec 2024 | Oct 2026 |
| Aider Polyglot score | 20.9 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1329 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 65.3 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 138 | — |
FAQ
Is QwQ 32B or Xing 4.0 29B A4B cheaper?
QwQ 32B is cheaper on output tokens ($0.86 vs $0.90 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, QwQ 32B or Xing 4.0 29B A4B?
Xing 4.0 29B A4B has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.