QwQ 32B vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens. Choose QwQ 32B or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | QwQ 32B | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | Meta |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.40 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.86 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Parameters | 33B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Dec 2024 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | 20.9 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1329 | 1261 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 65.3 | 44.2 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 138 | — |
FAQ
Is QwQ 32B or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct cheaper?
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is cheaper on output tokens ($0.40 vs $0.86 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, QwQ 32B or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?
Both models offer a similar context window.
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.