QwQ 32B vs MiMo V2.6 Pro (Tencent Cloud)
QwQ 32B is cheaper on output tokens, while MiMo V2.6 Pro (Tencent Cloud) offers a larger context window. Choose QwQ 32B or MiMo V2.6 Pro (Tencent Cloud) based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | QwQ 32B | MiMo V2.6 Pro (Tencent Cloud) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | LLM Gateway |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.44 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.86 | $0.87 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Parameters | 33B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Dec 2024 | Sep 2026 |
| Aider Polyglot score | 20.9 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1329 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 65.3 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 138 | — |
FAQ
Is QwQ 32B or MiMo V2.6 Pro (Tencent Cloud) cheaper?
QwQ 32B is cheaper on output tokens ($0.86 vs $0.87 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, QwQ 32B or MiMo V2.6 Pro (Tencent Cloud)?
MiMo V2.6 Pro (Tencent Cloud) has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.